Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÚ±â°ø¸í¿µ»ó¿¡¼­ÀÇ temporomandibular joint effusion°ú Áõ»ó ¹× ¼ö¼ú¼Ò°ß°úÀÇ ¿¬°ü¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÈÄÇâÀû ¿¬±¸

A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MRI EVIDENCE OF TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT EFFUSION AND CLINICO-SURGICAL FINDINGS

´ëÇѱ¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇÐȸÁö 1999³â 25±Ç 2È£ p.133 ~ 140
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÇü°ï/Hyung Gon Kim ÇãÁ¾±â/¹Ú±¤È£/À±ÇöÁß/±èÀϼö/³²±¤Çö/ÃÖÈñ¼ö/Jong Ki Huh/Kwang Ho Park/Hyun Joong Yoon/Il Soo Kim/Kwng Hyun Nam/Hee Soo Choi

Abstract

°á·Ð
ÀúÀÚ µîÀº 1994³âºÎÅÍ 1997³â±îÁö ¾Ç°üÀý Àå¾Ö·Î ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ¿µµ¿¼¼ºê¶õ½ºº´¿ø ¾Ç°üÀý Ŭ
¸®´Ð¿¡ ³»¿øÇÏ¿© ÀÓ»ó °Ë»ç ¹× ÀÚ±â°ø¸í¿µ»ó °Ë»ç¸¦ ¹ÞÀº ÈÄ ¾Ç°üÀý ³»ÀåÁõÀ¸·Î Áø´ÜµÇ¾î
°üÇ÷Àû ¼ö¼úÀ» ½ÃÇà ¹ÞÀº ȯÀÚµéÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¼ö¼ú Àü¿¡ ÃÔ¿µµÈ ÀÚ±â°ø¸í T2 °­Á¶¿µ»óÀ» ºÐ
¼®ÇÏ¿© °üÀý°­ ³»¿¡ °í°­µµ ½ÅÈ£¸¦ º¸ÀÌ´Â Á¤µµ¿Í ÇüÅ¿¡ µû¶ó joint elusionÀ» 4 ¹üÁÖ
(degree 0: °üÀý°­ ³»¿¡ °í°­µµ ½ÅÈ£°¡ °üÂûµÇÁö ¾ÊÀº °æ¿ì, degree 1: °í°­µµ ½ÅÈ£°¡ Á¢È÷
Áö ¾ÊÀº °üÀý¿øÆÇÀ» µû¶ó ¼± ¸ð¾çÀ¸·Î º¸À̰ųª Á¢Èù °üÀý¿øÆÇ ³»¿¡ ÇÑÁ¤µÇ¾î º¸ÀÌ´Â °æ¿ì,
degree 2: °üÀý¿øÆÇÀÇ °æ°è¸¦ ³Ñ¾î anterior recess±îÁö °í°­µµ ½ÅÈ£°¡ º¸ÀÌ´Â °æ¿ì, degree
3: °üÀý°­ ³» Àüü¿¡ °í°­µµ ½ÅÈ£°¡ °üÂûµÇ´Â °æ¿ì)·Î ºÐ·ùÇÏ°í, joint effusionÀÇ degree¿Í
ÀÓ»ó ¹× ¼ö¼ú ¼Ò°ß°úÀÇ ¿¬°ü¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÈÄÇâÀû ¿¬±¸¸¦ ÅëÇØ ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. ¾Ç°üÀý ³»ÀåÁõÀ¸·Î ¼ö¼ú ¹ÞÀº 289°üÀý Áß ÀÚ±â°ø¸í T2 °­Á¶¿µ»ó¿¡¼­ joint effusionÀÌ
°üÂûµÈ °üÀý(degree 1+2+3)Àº 166°üÀý(57.4%)À̾úÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌ Áß degree 1 ±ºÀº 82°üÀý, degree
2 ±ºÀº 69°üÀý, degree 3 ±ºÀº 15°üÀýÀ̾ú´Ù.
2. Æò±Õ °³±¸·®Àº degree 0 ±º¿¡¼­´Â 38.07§®, degree 3 ±º¿¡¼­´Â 33.47§®·Î joint effusion
ÀÇ degree°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÒ¼ö·Ï °³±¸·®Àº °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù.
3. ¾Ç°üÀý ÅëÁõÀ» º¸ÀÎ °üÀýÀÇ ºñÀ²°ú Æò±Õ µ¿Åë Á¡¼ö´Â joint effusionÀÌ °üÂûµÈ ȯÀÚ±ºÀÌ
81.9%, 1.58·Î½á joint effusionÀÌ °üÂûµÇÁö ¾ÊÀº ±ºÀÇ 78.9%, 1.41º¸´Ù ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸³ª ±×
Â÷ÀÌ´Â ¶Ñ·ÇÇÏÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù.
4. °üÀýÀâÀ½Àº ¸ðµç ±º¿¡¼­ Å« Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾úÀ¸³ª, degree 3 ±º¿¡¼­ ¿°¹ßÀ½(crepitus)ÀÌ ´Ù¸¥
±ºº¸´Ù ³ôÀº ºñÀ²·Î °üÂûµÇ¾ú´Ù.
5. ¾Ç°üÀý ³»ÀåÁõ°ú ¿¬°üµÈ ÅëÁõÀ¸·Î½á, µÎÅë°ú ¸ñ ¹× ¾î±úÀÇ ÅëÁõÀº joint effusionÀÌ °ü
ÂûµÈ ȯÀÚ±º¿¡¼­ ´õ Àû°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç ƯÈ÷ µÎÅëÀº degree 2±º¿¡¼­, ¸ñ ¹× ¾î±úÀÇ ÅëÁõÀº
degree 1 ±º¿¡¼­ degree 0 ±º¿¡ ºñÇØ ÅëÁõÀÇ °¨¼Ò°¡ ¶Ñ·ÇÇÏ¿´´Ù(p<0.05).
6. ¼ö¼ú ¼Ò°ß Áß °üÀý¿øÆÇ ÈÄ Á¶Á÷ÀÇ ÃæÇ÷Àº õ°øÀ̳ª À¯Âø°ú´Â ´Þ¸® joint elusionÀÌ °üÂû
µÈ ȯÀÚ±º¿¡¼­ Ư¡ÀûÀ¸·Î ³ôÀº ºóµµ·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.

Purpose : Although joint effusion caused by the inflammatory changes of synovium
has been known to be associated with joint pain, it is still controversial. This study is
to clarify the relationship between the evidence of joint effusion seen high signal
intensity in T2- weighted magnetic resonance imaging and clinico-surgical findings.
Materials and Methods : All of the patients were diagnosed as temporomandibular
joint internal derangement and received unilateral open surgery. The authors classified
the joint effusion as four categories by size and shape: degree 0-no evidence; degree
la-a line of high signal along articular surface in unfolded disc; degree 1b-high signal
spot in the folded disc; degree 2-pooling in the anterior recess and folded disc; degree
3-pooling in the glenoid fossa and along articular eminence. The authors evaluated
clinical and surgical findings.
Results : Two-hundred eighty-nine patients(242 females) with mean age of 30.2
years(range: 14 to 74) were included. High signal intensity was seen in 166
joints(57.4%): degree 1 in 82 joints, degree 2 in 69 joints(23.9%), degree 3 in 15
joints(5.2%). Maximal mouth opening of degree 0 group was 38.07§®, degree 1:36.34§®,
degree 3:33.47§®. Mean TMJ pain score of the joint effusion groups was 1.58, no
evidence group was 1.41. Click of degree 0 group was 44.7%, degree 3 was 43.4%.
Crepitus of degree 0 group was 17.1%, degree 3 was 6.7%. Mean pain score of headache
of degree 0 group was 1.80, degree 2 was 1.22. Neck and shoulder pain of degree 0
group was 50.4%, degree 1 was 39.0%. Perforation, adhesion, hyperemia of degree 0 was
27.6%, 35.8%, 18.7%, degree 2:23.2%, 29.0%, 29.3%(degree 1).
Conclusions : TMJ pain, TMJ sound and surgical findings did not relate significantly
to the joint effusion of TMJ, but referred symptoms such as headache, neck and
shoulder pain were less severe in the joint effusion groups.

Å°¿öµå

joint effusion; magnetic resonance image; temporomadibular joint;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed